Previous Page  100 / 118 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 100 / 118 Next Page
Page Background

accurately and scoring a confident and

authoritative 34 runs. A wonderful throw

from Ha at deep third-man to effect a run-

out was another highlight.We beat Cothill

in convincing style. Put in to bat first, we

started edgily and lost five wickets cheaply.

But

Henry Minter

calmly steadied the

ship, scoring 29 in the process. And then Hu

began to smash the ball all over the place!

He took full advantage of the rather short

boundary in scoring 59 not out, with three

sixes and nine fours to thrill the Summer

Fields supporters. Mellor, Ha and

Boni Yin

all

bowled well and in the end we had scored

156 to their 62. Quite rightly, Mellor was

moved up to a higher level after this match.

The 8th XI lost both its matches against

Caldicott but enjoyed a wonderful victory

over Moulsford’s 7th XI – we won by 10

wickets! They scored 58 and our openers

James Stewart-Smith

and Yin coolly

steered us to the required total for no loss.

Sam Mackie

captained the team most

efficiently.

George Hopkinson-Woolley

took three wickets and

Simon Luo

also

bowled competently for his two scalps.

As ever, presiding over 4th Game cricket

was extremely hard work at times: it could

not be said that they all loved the sport!

But we staggered – just about! – to the end

of the season.

JHB

7th XI

Opposition

Result

Runs

Details

For Against

Caldicott

Drew 59-6 152-5

Elstree 5th XI

Lost

99

100

Cothill

Won 156-9

62

Hu 59*, Minter 29

Caldicott

Lost

70

159-8

8th XI

Opposition

Result

Runs

Details

For Against

Caldicott

Lost

34

36-3

Moulsford 7th X

Won 59-0

58

Caldicott

Lost

18

169

Colts A XI

“It isn’t the start that matters.

It is the finish line.” Julien

Smith’s assertion is highly

appropriate for the 2016 Colts

A squad. The group made

significant progress over the

course of the season; indeed,

I cannot remember working

with a group who developed

so much in such a relatively

short period of time.

In the first three matches

Gus Howland

,

Gus Stanhope

and

Harry Lowndes-Lumb

each showed good potential as all-

rounders but collectively the team did not

perform with the intent or skill required

for victory (admittedly, against some

very good opposition). It is very much to

the squad’s credit that they responded

to the shortcomings highlighted in these

fixtures, working hard in practice to hone

fundamental skills.

The season spectacularly sparked

into life against Elstree. A good bowling

performance, particularly from Stanhope

(5-38), left the team chasing 137 to win

– nearly 40 more than any of our previous

scores.

Rory McNair

batted almost

unconcernedly through our innings with

power and conviction and his 68 - ably

supported by a valuable innings from

Eddie Burnaby-Atkins

– saw the team win

by 5 wickets in the final over.

The team’s growing confidence was

sternly examined by Ludgrove.We were

reduced to 0-3 after the first two overs

before Lowndes-Lumb (40*) and Howland

(45*), mixing crease-occupation with

aggression to frustrate the opposition, set

a good, though by no means huge, target.

George Laing’s

excellent spin bowling

stopped Ludgrove getting ahead of the

run-rate, although at 90-1 they looked

favourites to win. However, the regular

fall of wickets took the game to the last

over, bowled by

Nick Crawford

. Although

Ludgrove needed only four runs he

combined great accuracy and good speed

and conceded only two runs to give us a

narrow victory.

Against Cothill it was our turn to

chase down a target. A good fielding

performance restricted the opposition to

125 with

Henry Kendall

taking important

wickets through the innings. Our reply

started slowly and we lost a number of

early wickets. Howland, watchful at first,

established a good foundation with

Oliver

Edwards

and – behind the run-rate with

“Theseason

spectacularly

sparked into life

againstElstree.”

S u m m e r F i e l d s

2 0 1 5 – 2 0 1 6

96